User blog comment:Matortheeternal/Reinvigoration of Categorization/@comment-1886094-20110201203307/@comment-883664-20110202005615

@kakki: Ok. That's fine. I wasn't necessarily laying all this down as law anyways - I posted it here to get community input.. 1) So the plan for this item is to make more? 3) Ok, that's fine, it's not that important I s'pose. 5) Ok, the styles section wasn't very important to me anyways. 6) Makes sense.

But I hope that no one denies that we do have some work to do. I know that some of these improvements are legitimate and should be implemented. At the least, the systems already in place need to be improved and more links should be made to them so users can find them and use them (for indeed, a system is useless if no one can find it and use it).

So on the other 7 items we have not reached an accord. Let us discuss them more here...

1) We should expand this categorization system so it is in place for all/most authors. 2) This system is less necessary than the others, should it be removed? y/n? 3) We aren't doing this. 4) We must categorize more stories by genre using the current system. 5) We decided this categorization system was unnecessary... 6) We aren't doing this because it'd be too much work. 8) More articles need to be categorized into the system. 9) More articles need to be categorized into the system and more categories should be made for this system. 10) ??? 11) I'll help find more of these unneeded categories.

Other: We need to create the main categories that hold certain categories. IE: A category should be made called "Stories by Author" which then holds all the author categories. And a navigational home should be made linking to all of these main categories.

If you agree/disagree please say so.